[방송]Former manager Shin Hyun-jun “It is not false information such as GapJil and Propofol… ”Refutation

Shin Hyun-joon’s former manager, who claimed he had suffered abusive speech and irrational settlement, again refuted his position.

On the 22nd, Shin Hyun-joon’s former manager, Kim Gwang-seop, said through his legal representative, “Shin Hyun-joon said that the prosecution had concluded the case without charge in relation to the controversy about Gap and the drug administration that he raised. It claims to be false, but it reveals that this is not true.”

Mr. Kim said, “I have not asked an investigative agency to investigate the controversy against Shin Hyun-joon. Therefore, the argument of Shin Hyun-joon to the effect that the controversy over Shin-Hyun-Jun turned out to be untrue is not true.” Insisted.

He said, “The case that I asked for an investigation related to the propofol medication was as if I had not introduced the hospital that received the propofle to Shin Hyun-jun, but the explanation of whether the explanation of Shin Hyun-jun, who said that he had introduced the hospital to Shin Hyun-jun, is false. “The investigative agency has only made a decision not to charge Shin Hyun-jun because it is difficult to see that the expression’introduced’ is an expression that could damage the person’s reputation.”

Mr. Kim said, “Currently, Shin Hyun-jun has sued the prosecution for defamation on the grounds that the contents of his disclosure are false, so I will inform you that he will re-state his position after the results of the prosecution’s investigation in the future.”

In July of last year, former manager Shin Hyun-joon, CEO Kim Gwang-seop, argued that he suffered from unfair treatment and overdue wages for 13 years working with the actor. Afterwards, CEO Kim filed an accusation by revealing that Shin Hyun-jun had illegally administered propofol more than 10 years ago.

Since then, in November, after about four months of investigation, Shin Hyun-jun was unprosected for’no charge’ for all the contents that CEO Kim claimed. At that time, Shin Hyun-joon had sued Kim for defamation, saying, “I will take all responsibility seriously.”

The following is the official position of former manager Shin Hyun-jun

1. I am Kim 00, who previously worked as a manager for actor Shin Hyun-jun. Recently, Shin Hyun-jun claimed that the prosecution had closed the case without charge in relation to the controversy over the Gap-jil controversy and the drug administration controversy that he raised. .

① Regarding the controversy

I have not asked an investigative agency to investigate the controversy itself against Hyun-jun Shin. Therefore, Shin Hyun-jun’s argument to the effect that the controversy over Shin Hyun-jun has been found to be untrue is not true.

However, I raised the issue as there were several false facts that could damage my honor among the clarifications released by Shin Hyun-jun regarding the controversy about Gap-jil, but the investigative agency was not interviewed by Shin Hyun-jun, but others around him. The decision was made without charge because it was difficult to say that it was the content or that it was announced in the process of refuting the content of the interview, and that it was difficult to believe that it was intended to slander or defam the person.

② Proposal related

In the past, I have raised a problem related to Shin Hyun-jun’s administration of Propople, but the complaint was rejected because the statute of limitations was already exceeded.

However, separately from this, the case that I requested for an investigation was as if I had not introduced the hospital that received the propopul to Shin Hyun-jun, as if he had introduced the hospital to Shin Hyun-jun. In response to this, the investigative agency has only decided not to charge Shin Hyun-jun because it is difficult to see that the expression’introduced’ is an expression that could damage his honor.

2. Rather, after revealing that he had been unfairly treated by Shin Hyun-jun in the past, several people who worked with or related to Shin Hyun-jun agreed to Shin Hyun-jun and received the salary of a junior road manager from Shin Hyun-jun through a media interview. The person did not pay after he did not pay, or by stating that he had committed a fraudulent act of not returning the investment after recruiting investors under the pretense of being a manager of Shin Hyun-jun. In response to this, the prosecution recognized his claim as fact and prosecuted Mr. Lee for defamation due to false facts in a timely manner, and the police sent him to the prosecution as an opinion of insults. We inform you that a police investigation is underway.

3. Currently, Mr. Shin Hyun-joon has sued the prosecutor for defamation on the grounds that the contents of his disclosure are false, so we will inform you that he will re-state his position after the results of the prosecution’s investigation in the future.

YTN star reporter Seonghyun Kim ([email protected])
[사진 제공 = OSEN]

[저작권자(c) YTN & YTN plus 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]

– .